Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North American Federation of Temple Youth - Mid-Atlantic Region


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was to relist. See Articles for deletion/Jewish summer camps and local organizations Dr Zak 02:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

North American Federation of Temple Youth - Mid-Atlantic Region
Utterly non-notable organisation, article is a vanity project for the group, and is not referenced in any way.  Páll  (Die pienk olifant) 05:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 05:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn organisation. --Ter e nce Ong 05:51, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Melchoir 07:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete.--Jusjih 14:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Possible merge with NFTY, as this is part of a major, national youth organization with 1,000s of members, something the nom has chosen not to address. Part of an ongoing campaign to nominate scores of articles related to one religion. -- JJay 23:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * False, it's just a (stub) category cleanup. (Categories are organised by topic) Kim Bruning 00:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but it's your comment that is false, since this article is not a stub, nor was it tagged as a stub at the time of nomination. I would suggest that you carefully consider the articles before making comments of that type (i.e. actually look at them). -- JJay 00:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Hence the (stub) in parens. You were alluding to a pattern. PZFUN started out in the category for judaism related stubs, and then widened the search to pages that were similar to the pages already found to be lacking. Kim Bruning 00:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Whatever excuse you want to give, this is not the way to approach improving content. I would suggest the nom make use of article talk pages, or clean-up tags, rather then blanket nominating entire categories/stubs or anything else. That would be a far more constructive "pattern". -- JJay 00:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Please adjust the relevant policy pages accordingly. Kim Bruning 01:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what policies you would like to adjust. Deletion policy is policy. It has a whole section on "alternatives to deletion". None seem to have been attempted by this user. -- JJay 01:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.