Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Borneo/Sabah

North Borneo/Sabah was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Bizarre, POV, raving rant. I don't know if this can be speedied, but it should be deleted regardless. - Lucky 6.9 04:49, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete as incoherent. There must be an interesting story behind that rant, but there's no way the article is going to reveal it.  --Ardonik 05:35, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but fix POV. It seems we could have a good article on North Borneo and Sabah if someone took a small amount of time to go look it up.  Perhaps we should change the name to just North Borneo with Sabah as a redirect?  Just a thought.  -SocratesJedi 07:12, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but massively fix the POV. See Socrates Jedi's points. [[User:DO'Neil|DO'&#1048;eil]] 09:55, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Is this even in English? Delete!  Exploding Boy 10:28, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * This seems familiar &mdash; I believe we learnt a bit about this in history class this year. Everything after the first two paragraphs is POV, though, but those first two ought to be merged with Sabah and Borneo, and the page deleted. Johnleemk | Talk 12:22, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, ranting casts doubt on the claimed "facts". We have an article on North Borneo, but based on my previous net research, we need a real library-type book for any additional depth. Stan 16:03, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)