Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Corporation Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without prejudice to recreation IF substantive sources are located. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

North Corporation Primary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. No references. Imcdc (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep as a listed building per WP:GEOFEAT, as long as sources can be found (the current one is a dead link). -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete although listed, it was delisted, and demolished. There doesn't seem to be any information available on it. There's not much point in having an article that says nothing except that a non-notable school once occupied a building that might have been interesting but got demolished without anyone being interested enough to write anything about it anywhere. If sources surface, and someone's interested, it could be recreated; there is nothing of value here at the moment. Elemimele (talk) 05:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Elemimele. I am unable to find anything in old newspapers or any kind of reliable material to even try and expand the current article. The fact this held listed building status does not in itself afford notability to the school which was once occupying that building, itself now no longer existing. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment, just because a listed building has been delisted then demolished doesn't mean that it is not wikinotable, but in this case it was a grade II, one of 370th, so more then once was listed is required? Coolabahapple (talk) 07:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It being a former listed building does not necessarily afford it notability either. Listed status implies a degree of architectural significance to protect from demolition or significant change, but not explicitly that it is a notable construction. I have not found anything to suggest otherwise and Necrothesp's WP:SOURCESEXIST rationale isn't looking particularly credible without any substantive referencing. Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * agree that sources are paramount (not found in this case). Coolabahapple (talk) 00:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note that I did not put forward a WP:SOURCESEXIST rationale. I said it would be notable if sources exist. I can't find any, but someone else may be able to. -- Necrothesp (talk) 07:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.