Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Karnataka fate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

North Karnataka fate

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball to predict fate of a region. Redtigerxyz Talk 16:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTSOAP. This is really a coatrack and the topic is covered in an encyclopaedic manner within North Karnataka and Belgaum border dispute. This article on the other hand synthesis sources (most already included in the other two) to advance a political position. Merging anything is really a bad idea as it would require a complete rewrite to do that and the resulting redirect is more than problematic. – Spaceman  Spiff  17:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete an unencyclopedic collection of issues speculating on the fate of North Karnataka. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 17:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per spaceman & deepak. ¨¨ victor   falk  20:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Spaceman. There is very little to merge: North Karnataka covers everything of interest already, and the parts relevant to Belgaum border dispute look like a POV-driven content fork.  This article is actually about "justifying" a POV relevant only to political issues in Karnataka. rudra (talk) 21:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per spaceman and deepak. Any encyclopedic content is properly added to North Karnataka. This article is unavoidably predictive and non-neutral, as well as inherently running afoul of WP:CRYSTAL. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete COATRACK/CRYSTAL issues cannot be resolved, no merge.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 09:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet another joke in the name of creation of small states. Hometech (talk) 20:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.