Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Loop (bank)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion .. I am disregarding the word "keep" written by Nolobank because it offers no rationale whatsoever, not even a bad one, and AfD is not a vote (and based on username is fairly evidently someone with a COI). &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

North Loop (bank)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. No effective referencing.  scope_creep Talk  18:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

keep by user:Nolobank. Sig added by   scope_creep Talk  08:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment References are mix of press-releases that are dependent coverage and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND but also user-generated and their own content as refs like Trustpilot that fail WP:NOT and WP:NOTADVERTISING.   scope_creep Talk  08:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.