Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Lungpher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Keep nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete arguments (non-admin closure) Yoenit (talk) 21:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

North Lungpher

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Village fails WP:GNG. No reliable sources show up on Google. Derild 49  21  ☼  15:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: According to website wide consensus, all villages are inherently notable. Joe Chill (talk) 15:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Really? I'm pretty sure I've seen a few AFD's where villages were deleted. Derild  49  21  ☼  15:17, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Really. Joe Chill (talk) 15:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind, searching through the archives I found the same result with other village article. I withdraw this AFD. Anyone feel free to close it. Derild  49  21  ☼  15:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Villages are inherently notable. Narthring (talk • contribs) 15:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.