Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Luzon West Expressway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

North Luzon West Expressway

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Purely a neologism based on the name of North Luzon East Expressway, without any reliable sources. No user in the Tambayan Philippines project have discovered that this is really a neologism. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 13:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. 13:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. 13:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Created by banned user.--RioHondo (talk) 06:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete UnsourcedHariboneagle927 (talk) 12:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Although I offically added "Semi-retired" template on my userpage, I won't still abandon from making small to medium editing here (I won't be retiring anyway hehe :) ) BTW, with regards to this "North Luzon West Expressway" (or should I say, "NLEX West"), I have found nothing to support this. One thing, there is no indication in the media (e.g. PHL news agencies) that STE, SCTEX, and TPLEX merging each other to become NLEX West, at least during this time. Another thing is that this "network" is not solely maintained and operated by one concessionaire. Both STE and SCTEX are operated by MNTC/MPIC (which is NLEX's operator, as per their articles here), while TPLEX is by Private Infra Dev Inc., so a merger to form "NLEX West" is highly impossible and unrealistic. I cannot say that this article should be kept, nor deleted, but to me, the NLEX West is an unrealistic expwy network, based on self-conceptualization and unfounded rumors. JWilz12345 (talk) 08:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * BTW, the content of "NLEX West" is unsourced (I agree with Hariboneagle927), and based from edit history it has'nt been substantially improved since 2012 (except for minor changes/additions, such as adding expwy shields), in short outdated (it even refers SCTEX in future tense, despite of it being completed since c. 2012).JWilz12345 (talk) 08:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: More consensus is needed for this matter.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 06:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as something that probably only exists in the mind of the editor that created the article. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.