Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Shore Congregation Israel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW keep - has also added some more references. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 02:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

North Shore Congregation Israel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Onel5969 (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article already has sufficient sourcing to show its notability both as an influential congregation and for its building. More sources are apparent from a basic search, such as --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The sources provided in the article, and those listed above, address the architectural notability of the congregation's synagogue building. Alansohn (talk) 02:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep. Meets GNG.  Per the above.
 * I note this nom is also attempting to delete a number of other synagogue articles, which also appear to have the requisite coverage. See the 5-top-listed articles nominated by him, today, here. (I'm commenting on similar AfD nominations today by nom that suffer from the same malady in the nomination; I'm not saying that nom acted in bad faith - just that he is seeking today to delete five synagogue articles on the same unwarranted basis). Epeefleche (talk) 03:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep. Meets WP:GNG. noted architect.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedily keep per current sources and WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.