Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Star Writers Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  11:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

North Star Writers Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nonnotable now-defunct syndicate. While it had a handful of notable writers, it does not appear that the syndicate itself ever received any coverage. Thargor Orlando (talk) 15:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. This search shows some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)   This search is more useful. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  20:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Press releases don't count toward notability. Thargor Orlando (talk) 21:27, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The Editor & Publisher references may have been written using a press release as source material, but most of them seem to be legitimate journalist-written news articles. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 23:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There's also some coverage here Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.