Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Texas–UTSA football rivalry (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

North Texas–UTSA football rivalry
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:GNG requires f a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. The article lacks GNG citations of a rivalry. (There are 5 citations: 1. "There’s also a budding rivalry between the two schools." 2. none - a schedule list, 3. valid citation, 4. none, 5. a box score) The prior AfD did not discover WP:RS citations to establish a rivalry. Post-AfD discussion (Talk:North Texas–UTSA football rivalry) generated no response from those who !Voted keep. Fails GNG as written, possibly WP:TOOSOON with only five games played. UW Dawgs (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete There's nothing in the sources which indicate this is a rivalry of any notability, apart from the fact it may become one in the future. SportingFlyer  talk  04:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 18:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Game summaries attempting to masquerade as an article. I agree with the nominator in that the sourcing that suggests this might be a potential rivalry, but insufficient sources exist on which to build an article. -- Kinu t/c 06:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons I gave in the last AFD on this subject, and now per WP:UNOPPOSED.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.