Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern districts of Sughd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Northern districts of Sughd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no such region. Sughd Region of Tajikistan is divided into districts. On occasion, some districts can be referred to a group of northern districts (and not necessarily the same ones), but this is not a subdivision in any sense. Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tajikistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep ... and Isfaragi groups in the northern districts of Sughd province (Maschoi Kuhna, Maschoi Nav and Isfara).  As shown in map 3.6, the highest number of WASH deprived households are found in Khatlon region and in the northern districts of Sughd.  Northern districts of Sughd: Asht District, Ghafurov District, Ghonchi District, Zafarobod District, Istaravshan (Ura-Tyube) District, Isfara District, Konibodom District, Mastchoh District, Spitamen District, Rasulov (Jabbor Rasulov) District and Shahriston District (Sughd_Region)Shevonsilva (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not an official division. Anybody can pick up a group of districts and call them northern or southern.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. It is never mentioned in article as a political division or a region with finite boundaries.  These may be commonly used partitions and have more weights to geographical divisions. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No, it is not a commonly used particion. It is a partition used in a book you happen to have access while stamping your microstubs. We had similar discussions before, and I strongly advised you to only write about subjects you know what you are talking about. This is clearly not such a subject.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry, it is a subject we know. I will reply soon.  Shevonsilva (talk) 15:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The southern part of the province is the east-west valley of the upper Zarafshan River. North, over the Turkestan Range, is the Ferghana Valley. (Sughd Region) If we are going to delete the article, please remove or modify the content of the Sughd Region to make it more consistent, and, if we want to keep it, please leave it as it is.  Anyway, I do not really like to argue with people.  best wishes.  Shevonsilva (talk) 17:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * As usual, your comment makes no sense. What do you think the Sughd Region article needs to be consistent with? It is perfectly coherent. Imaginatorium (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * @Ymblanter Thanks for cross checking the references with articles and improved my awareness of the articles a bit long ago. 17:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. The existence of a noun phrase somewhere in a book simply is not enough to justify a permastub. Imaginatorium (talk) 16:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely pointless stub that does not even say what this consists of. It is one short sentence that says (paraphrasing) that Sughd has a northern part.  Well, duh, so does anywhere. SpinningSpark 12:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if this were a defined grouping of districts, there is no reason to have a separate lazy one-sentence article rather than giving such grouping in the main article. Reywas92Talk 17:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.