Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northkeep


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Forgotten Realms cities. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Northkeep

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fictional location does not establish notability independent of Dungeons & Dragons through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into List of Forgotten Realms cities. BOZ (talk) 16:24, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge as per User:BOZ; this page has been a redirect twice already according to its history; there's enough information here for a small entry on the list, and it's a potential search term.Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 21:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of Forgotten Realms cities. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * transwiki to some fanboy site that would love this kind of trivia. otherwise, fails WP:GNG - all the sources are non-independent primary sources and so the options are delete or merge (if there is appropriate content and an appropriate target)-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of Forgotten Realms cities (if there is appropriate content), otherwise Delete. The absence of significant coverage from reliable independent secondary sources does not establish notability for the topic, which means there cannot be a stand-alone article, per WP:GNG.Folken de Fanel (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete merging will do nothing to fix the fundamental problems of lack of sources to add any real world context on the subject. We simply end up with large ever growing merge targets that still have all the same fundamental flaws.  Ridernyc (talk) 03:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.