Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northrop Switchblade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Northrop Switchblade

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has no sources independent of the patent applications which verify notability BilCat (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * delete (not an aircraft, just a patent) and move material to a relevant article, like Variable-sweep wing--Marc Lacoste (talk) 08:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 *  merge and disambiguate redirect to Northrop Grumman Switchblade: The article lacks citations for any actual research. If these were present then Northrop's patronage would make it notable, per WP:NAIR. No doubt such research was conducted, but I can find no WP:RS documenting it. That may be because the patent makes no mention of "switchblade", so this article would then be wrongly-named. I suspect that the Internet meme merchants have confused it with the Northrop Grumman Switchblade oblique wing project. I agree with that the content should be merged into Variable-sweep wing and I would add to that the Forward-swept wing. But I think this page should be kept as a disambig page. Some readers will be coming here looking for the patented Internet meme, let the redirect inform them. If RS is ever uncovered, then a new page with better content can be created under a more appropriate title. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC) -- Updated 22:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - no references cited means it fails WP:GNG. The patent linked to makes no mention of "Switchblade" nor is there any indication that the company intends to build this. - Ahunt (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete articles are to have references, which this article doesn't have.Catfurball (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see that this is a pretty old article; there has been plenty of time for reliable sources to exist if it was in any way notable.TheLongTone (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.