Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northumberland House, Northumberland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Northumberland House, Northumberland
This article is for a house with no noted importance or encyclopedic value. It reads like an advertisment and comes from an IP of a known vandel. SirGrant 02:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not sure if this even exists. A search for "Northumberland House" +Wark brings very little besides Wikipedia and mirrors.  There is a famous Northumberland House which is (or was) in London. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it does exist wark %22Northumberland House%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=18, . Notability is an issue - I don't see any.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  03:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Not notible at all (if the vote ends up as a keep, can I write about my house too? ;) Th ε Halo Θ 12:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. If this house was in the USA, its age would make it notable, and this would be a almost unanimous keep. -- GWO
 * Reply But the fact is that it's in the UK, and houses this old are a dime a dozen. I'm sitting in one older than Northumberland House right now. Th ε Halo Θ 16:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, my family's house in London is about the same age as this, and it has no encyclopedic notability at all. There must be tens of thousands of properties of this age or older in the UK Bwithh 18:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Bwithh 18:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Molerat 20:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete my house survived slum clearance, does that make it notable? =) =D doktorb wordsdeeds 09:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator : Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' - Mailer Diablo 03:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.