Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Front


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:01, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Northwest Front

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Organisation is non-notable, no secondary sources available. The NWF seems to be the dream of one nutter, as outlined in a few fiction books and nowhere else. Article is written like an advertisement/propaganda piece. Orpheus (talk) 15:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Over 1500 members and growing fast, we have our own forum and we are organizing fast now.. it's obvious the wiki page is being considered for deletion because we are not politically correct. Yet thousands of leftist wiki pages exist for the most obscure groups and topics. Leave the NWF page alone! (posted by Watcher) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.7.210 (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

What about adding http://www.toqonline.com/2010/03/northwest-homeland/ to one of the references? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.107.191.88 (talk) 00:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The Occidental Quarterly isn't really a reliable source. Orpheus (talk) 13:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't know, I've heard about it more than once before(not on Wikipedia) so isn't it a good thing for Wikipedia to have a page on it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.236.214.39 (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC) very little notoriety what does that have to do with deletion, there is a lot of stuff on wikipedia which are not very well known. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forky1138 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable fringe group, with very little notoriety. Bearian (talk) 20:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - I concur with Bearian. Settl746 (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Where are the sources? Lionelt (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.