Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwestern Mutual - Louisville


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete all 35. Johnleemk | Talk 14:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Northwestern Mutual - Louisville and related articles
Delete per Chains and Franchises of WP:CORP. This page does not provide any useful corporate information, and is more of an advertisement for a specific NML office. If this were acceptable, then there would be pages on every single branch office that is a part of NML (or of any company for that matter), which is wholly unnecessary. Kinu 01:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Delete the lot per WP:CORP. --Andy Saunders 17:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Addendum: Apparently there are many such articles, such as The Bohannon Group, The Stewart Financial Group, Theodore Financial Group, The Waltos Group, The Effner Financial Group, The Columns Resource Group... and they've been created/edited by the same people, most recently 38.192.2.179 (see his/her contributions page). It would not surprise me if this was a person merely interested in increasing NML's presence on Wikipedia through these "spamvertisement" means.  These are simply local insurance offices with no relevance to NML corporate; while adding information about NML as a corporation would be helpful on their main page, these are local agent offices, and information on them would be better off deleted than merged.  (After all, imagine having a list of every Allstate agent on their page... yikes!)  --Kinu 02:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps someone could take the time to AfD all above mentioned subsiduaries - I'm off! Camillus (talk) 02:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I think I've got most of them. If anyone finds one based on a search or the aforementioned anonymous user's contributions page, feel free to tag it as well.  --Kinu 03:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge with Northwestern Mutual. Camillus (talk) 01:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --djrobgordon 07:36, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This and the other 34 (i think) pages tagged by the nom or Kinu. I think they have tagged every branch office that appears on the what links here page from Northwestern Mutual other than Russell Investment Group and McTigue Financial Group.  That makes sense as those are larger companies recently aquired by Northwestern and we dont need this neccessary mass purge to get caught up in debating these 2.Obina 11:51, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, McTigue Financial Group should be a part of this group of AfDs, as that is another one of those local branch offices/franchisees as defined above, and not a company acquired by NML. That article is a party to this VSCA as well.  But correct, the article on the Frank Russell Co. should be a keep. --Kinu 15:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * CommentThese are the 35 pages currently tagged Hoopis Financial GroupThe Waltos GroupThe Effner Financial Group The Derrickson Financial Group The Columns Resource Group The Bohannon Group The Stewart Financial Group Carolina Condrey Group The Early Agency Theodore Financial Group The Cleveland Group The Las Vegas Network Office of the Northwestern Mutual Financial Network Texas Financial Group - Dallas Texas Financial Group Las Vegas Network Office Fobes Financial Group Central Pennsylvania Group Fairfield Financial Group The Nemec Financial Group The Tyler Group NMFN Charlotte The Downs Group The Freehold Financial Group The Lowery Group Strategic Financial Group The Boulder Group The Carr Group Northwestern Mutual - Louisville The Pritzl Group The Beer Financial Group The Central Pennsylvania Group The Washington Group The Texas Financial Group - North Houston The Megill Financial Group The Binghamton Group Obina 12:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:WOTTA! Do you mean "companies and corporations?" :-)


 * Zap 'em all - what a cheek! Camillus (talk) 18:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Vanispamcruftisement -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 03:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom Melchoir 05:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all -- Astrokey44 |talk 04:13, 6 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I think it's probably handier to Merge into one article, in this case. OTOH, I'm lazy, I'm not going to do it ;-) Kim Bruning 13:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.