Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwestern University Charter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. there is an admin with a wikisource account looking at this so no need to reanswiki, they can do it themselves Spartaz Humbug! 07:28, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Northwestern University Charter

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This document in itself does not seem to meet the requirement of notability, and in itself would not seem to meet the requirements of Wikipedia.

This document may be able to hosted at Wikisource, and contributor has been contacted directly to engage in the discussion, though in its existing form, it is not suitable for transfer. billinghurst  sDrewth  14:13, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  01:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol merge vote.svg|15px]][[Image:Symbol redirect vote.svg|15px]] Merge/redirect — to Northwestern University. Gosox(55)(55) 15:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Either transwiki to Wikisource or just delete. Full text original documents do not normally belong in Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:23, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * comment Not to transwiki in this form, I can recover it as necessary if that is required for transfer with my enWS admin hat on billinghurst  sDrewth  10:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what the problem with transwikiing this is, but it doesn't make much difference to me. I have changed my recommendation to "delete" to help this AfD to be closed faster. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:44, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Transwiki; this is just the sort of content that Wikisource likes, and it's just the sort that we don't. Nyttend (talk) 05:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per WP:NOT. No point in delaying the deletion for a transwiki when it's already available at archive.org. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.