Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norwalk high school


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Note this is a thirteen year old discussion that applies to one of the residents of this page, which is now a DAB page. (non-admin closure) John from Idegon (talk) 05:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Norwalk high school
Nothing on the page suggests this school is notable. Edward 00:56, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.  Wikipedia is not a school database.  --Randy Johnston 01:25, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete for utter lack of context. I'm aware of two Norwalks (California and Connecticut) and this doesn't even say which one the school is in! - Lucky 6.9 03:08, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Again, we have to do the research to see if it exists, then where it is, and then if this information is correct, and then we're still left with a fact, rather than a discussion. If this is in CA or CT, a set of facts could go in a big list or a big table.  As I've said repeatedly, I won't complain about that.  Geogre 04:27, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, not enyclopedic, cannot discern what school it is talking about. --Fastfission 05:57, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Connecticut, but Delete this substub unless improved. Cool Hand Luke  06:24, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Disambiguate and there'll be two stubs. Dr Zen 07:03, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --Improv 07:35, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge into appropriate Cincinnati and delete - Skysmith 09:19, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Concur -- Jmabel | Talk 02:05, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable. --ShaunMacPherson 08:05, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep or at the very least redirect as appropriate. &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 08:37, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Indrian 05:32, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notablity not a deletion criteria. Intrigue 23:33, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * delete' but it is a inclusion criteria, and what message do you want to send. one you put your article in, wether or not its notable, your home free? Fledgeling 14:36, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.  Wikipedia is not a school database.  Gamaliel 18:33, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. The more info, the merrier. --zenohockey 02:30, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * keep - Stubs are useful. JesseW 02:35, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Del No significant info & every sign (in spite of a substantial population base) that no one gives a damn & it will always be an eyesore. --Jerzy(t) 02:39, 2004 Dec 5 (UTC)
 * Keep. Valid stub.  Deleting this helps no one.  --L33tminion | (talk) 08:07, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep Wyss 12:04, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Recycling Troll 17:31, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.