Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norwegian UFO-sighting 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Norwegian UFO-sighting 2006

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Two years ago, someone saw a light in the sky. "Some people believed, and the newspapers half-seriously claimed that it was a UFO". However, the "sighting" had no impact on anything, and should not be covered in Wikipedia. Punkmorten (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unremarkable event that since has been explained. No impact and nothing to expand the article with. - Mgm|(talk) 16:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, the title is faulty, I doubt it was the only Norwegian UFO sighting in 2006. If for some remarkable reason this is kept, it should definitely be renamed. - Mgm|(talk) 16:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is not a notable event at all, it's like something I'd read about in my local free weekly newspaper and then never hear about again.  Pursey  Talk 17:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a UFO now that it has been identified, so there is nothing to write about. WillOakland (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to bolide. To its credit, the article is sourced, although it looks like this quickly went from a UFO to an IFO.  Mandsford (talk) 21:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Mgm David WS (contribs)  23:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - and do not merge. There's nothing remarkable about this particular observation of a UFO. -- Whpq (talk) 18:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. __meco (talk) 11:43, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.