Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nosehill forest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Nosehill forest

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Openly presents itself as an high school project (at the end). Original research and Wikipedia is not a free host. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per RHaworth. I placed a prod tag on a very similar article yesterday-- Nose Hill Pond-- (same research, presumably same authors), for same reason. There may be historical and geographical segments which, if well sourced, could provide basis for a future article, without the science class original research. JNW (talk) 17:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, there already is a main article covering the environs: . JNW (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.