Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noshoring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. per WP:NEO, does not appear to be widely used. Black Kite 09:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Noshoring

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 18:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I thank you for your due diligence, but I did find more references to it online. Perhaps search under "noshore" and "no shore" as well. After all, every term, at some time, can be considered a neologism. Casper SSLLC (talk) 18:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete As per WP:NEO. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 20:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are handfuls of references, but zippo in Google News Archive does not ensure confidence it is a widely-used business term. --Dhartung | Talk 23:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Under WP:NEO.
 * Keep Found more references to it: http://www-b.informatik.uni-hannover.de/emisa/OLDA05/msg00002.html and http://www.stratvantage.com/news/062805.htm#1. It appears to be a business term in the same way in which nearshoring and offshoring are. Casper SSLLC (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NEO and WP:N.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 22:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.