Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nossaman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Nossaman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

At best, only suitably sourced by Law360 (lots of quotes/mentions, but couldn't find anything else reliable with sigcov) - and it's not clear how reliable/independent they are.

It's also significantly promotional, and may make it over the CSD line. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, even if notable I suggest we delete per WP:TNT to get rid of all the issues. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, promotional. Deleting per WP:TNT as suggested seems best option. Equine-man (talk) 07:44, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, I tried to remove the promotional tone from the page. I found some references from books and other historical materials. SO, I believe that the firm is old/notable and not a direct delete. Surely passes WP:GNG JK.Kite (talk) 22:14, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * GNG is not the appropriate guideline. For organizations like this it is WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete History of article. Original editor joined wiki purely to create this page, plus add references in other pages to legitimise the page. Equine-man (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.