Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not Just a Bond: A Bond with Israel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 22:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Not Just a Bond: A Bond with Israel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable (book), lacks sufficient reliable sources, and written by single-topic Wikipedian

Page is at Not Just a Bond: A Bond with Israel. Pointless article; not notable. Single-topic Wikipedian. Page is full of weasels. Page is lacking diverse citations (although diverse citations wouldn't help it to become notable, since it's lacking citations specifically because it's not). Notified Wikipedian. KBnaotwtleldee 06:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. What's not sufficient for consideration is the fact that Talpiot Press (the publisher) only has two publications under their belt, and that Worldcat only has one copy ANYWHERE in their attached databases (Library of Congress, which is quite normal for copyright procedure).  Suspicion aroused in that there is no visible ISBN.  Article indeed is a bit weasel flavored, so if you get rid of the weasels there wouldn't be much left.  A bit of name dropping.  Indeed, we have a single-purpose author, though they could be new, not sure. Most importantly, though, is that this fails to meet WP:GNG.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 15:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete based on current content. The article makes no claim for the notability of this book as a book; no reviews are cited, it does not appear to have reached any bestseller lists, and no mention is made of any awards the book may have won. (See WP:NBOOK.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per Dennis The Tiger. FWIW, the editor who created the article registered in 2008, but has only edited seven articles, with the overwhelming majority of her/his edits on three articles related to Israel Bonds. (Two of the seven articles are redirects to bond-related articles, and one of the other articles is about a former Israel Bond executive.) — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per Dennis The Tiger. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I also could not find any reviews or other sources that would support a claim on notability. Chris vLS (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge anything notable and sourced into Israel Bonds. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 18:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There doesn't seem to be any coverage for this book, so we can't really guarantee how much of it is accurate. If the publisher was one that was a household name as far as the academic/scholarly world goes then we could have some wiggle room with that, but I can't really find much out there about this publisher. Because of that, I'm hesitant to add anything that would potentially be sourced only to this book. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Doug Weller  talk 04:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as this is still questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.