Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not That Funny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The discussion was a little sparse, but the only person arguing to keep failed to give any policy-based reasons. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Not That Funny

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was PROD'd and author contested. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. A non-notable, non-charting song.  Azealia 911  talk  21:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Only released in a small number of countries and didn't chart in any of them. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Was performed on several Fleetwood Mac tours and the article does have a number of sources. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * A song being performed on tour, no matter how many times, isn't notable if the people performing it are the people who released it . Like all of the recent Fleetwood Mac stub articles I've AfD'd, the articles sources are all currently concerning the album it's from or a concert that gives the song a passing mention. Per WP:NSONGS "If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created." Although not explicitly required, it'd be nice to see at least one source entirely devoted to the song, as opposed to album reviews and concert reviews.  Azealia 911  talk  04:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Is there anything I can do to help the article Azealia911? Dobbyelf62 (talk) 12:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Not in my opinion no, had I thought the article could be improved I probably wouldn't have AfD'd it. Unless you find some reliable, third-party, independent sources that aren't album or concert reviews.  Azealia 911  talk  12:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. Is Rattlesnake Shake any better? I still have some additional sources just in case. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 12:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC) No harm in keeping the article. I don't see moving the content to the Tusk article. It wouldn't make any sense to put the information there. I feel like Not That Funny needs its own page. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 19:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NSONGS. The sources that have been found are for the album, so this song receives mentions as you would expect but that's it. Polequant (talk) 12:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.