Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not cool club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 04:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Not cool club
A page about a forum that barely establishes its notability, not to mention is barely sourcable. I mean no offense to the people at the Not Cool Club, but I don't think this is worthy of a Wikipedia article. —   05:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourceable per WP:RS, Alexa of 6,579,854 is one of the worst I've seen in a while. -- Kinu t /c  06:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Mildly entertaining though. --Daniel Olsen 06:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Does not meet WP:WEB, violates WP:NOT, and appears to be maintained by sockpuppets. --Dennette 09:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nigel (Talk) 12:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete CSD A7. Crabapplecove 13:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not unique or notable enough to be anything more than just one of many internet forums. "Recurring" and "notable" threads sections have nothing new or interesting about them. Seems to be merely a promotional tool. Tx17777 15:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * While I agree this page is not entirely sourced yet, it is also a work in progress and is not near complete. And no, it's not a promotional tool, it's an attempt by members of a small forum website to get the history of a place they frequent written down. SpillWaterLikeLove 16:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not an archive for your non-notable Web based social network's history. See also WP:VSCA. --Dennette 17:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Seems that it would be altogether proper to put the 4chan article up for deletion as well then. SpillWaterLikeLove 17:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: You are more than welcome to nominate it yourself, but please note that it might be considered a WP:POINT violation. That and I don't think many other editors would agree with your assessment. -- Kinu t /c  05:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete does not appear to make any sort of notability claim. -Elmer Clark 21:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree with the above, but the Not Cool Club is not trying to promote itself. It may not be notable to the people who are not members but to the people involved in the NCC its a big deal. Why not let the Not Cool Club have a page? Its not even near completion yet, lets just give it a chance. YoungHopelessLoser 169.203.255.194 22:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please see WP:ILIKEIT. This is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection of information about websites that fail WP:WEB. -- Kinu t /c  05:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I hadn't seen the WP:WEB article (this was my first time creating a page on Wikipedia), and after reading the line "Articles which merely include an external link and a brief description of its contents will also be either cleaned up to adhere to the neutral point of view or deleted", I agree that perhaps Wikipedia is not the best place for this article - this might be more of the realm of Encyclopedia Dramatica.SpillWaterLikeLove 17:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.