Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not the Bradys XXX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The alleged sources mentioned by Joaomufc are not cited in the article.  Sandstein  06:32, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Not the Bradys XXX

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. For an AfD on a page similar in scope, please see Articles for deletion/Babysitters (film). K.e.coffman (talk) 05:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:37, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete does not pass WP:NFILM or WP:GNG and be aware that although the article gives the impression this is softcore porn it is very much hardcore and is not covered in reliable sources, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as can't find any evidence of notability, Fails FILM & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - news coverage from Los Angeles Times, GQ & The Daily Beast Joaomufc (talk) 14:57, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Where ? .... Simply saying "Main coverage from X" means nothing to us..... – Davey 2010 Talk 19:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.