Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable Chapels in Siolim, Goa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Siolim. Consensus is that this does not merit a separate article, but to preserve attribution have redirected to Siolim, where the merge has already taken place. Davewild (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Notable Chapels in Siolim, Goa

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Topic is non-notable. Some part has been merged into Siolim The Discoverer (talk) 19:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete I can and do think that some travel guides would probably be able to establish notability of some churches in Siolim. I am in fact virtually certain of it. However, I do not see that the creator of this page has made any effort to establish the notability of the individual buildings or even of the topic itself as per WP:NOTABILITY. John Carter (talk) 20:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm not seeing any notability here. OSborn arfcontribs. 21:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Siolim Since the material in the article has been merged, redirect needs to be retained for the attribution history.  I'm a bit confused as to whether the article intended that chapels were not the same as churches, while this source was interesting.  Also, the use of the word "notable" in the article title cannot be construed to mean the same as wp:notable.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * MERGE with Siolim or Delete. Not notable. No reliable sources available or cited. So either Merge or delete. Better merge with Siolim without duplicating the contents already present in that page. --Bharathiya (talk) 19:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Merge with Siolim or Delete The article can't stand alone due to its lack of notability. --Artene50 (talk) 00:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete; bad article title. The Discoverer (talk) 08:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Siolim per Unscintillating. -- 202.124.73.246 (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.