Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable Threads

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:30, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Notable Threads
Delete Non-ecyclopedic --PhilipO 02:29, 22 August 2005 (UTC) PhilipO 02:29, 22 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete NN --152.91.9.131 02:33, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; nn, evil | Celcius 02:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; pointless. Jaxl | talk 02:40, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's a list of external links to threads on a discussion forum. Wikipedia is not a resource for conducting business.  It is not a place for discussion forum users to host bookmark pages for threads in their discussion forum that they find interesting. (Note that TESForums currently styles itself The Official TES Forums Wiki and links to a whole raft of these articles. Wikipedia is not a hosting service.) Delete. Uncle G 03:56:25, 2005-08-22 (UTC)
 * Delete per Uncle G and add that Wikipedia is not a repository of links. -- DS1953 04:32, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, page also blanked. &mdash; Linnwood 05:26, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn forum vanity. - Mgm|(talk) 08:35, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Is there a 'Wikinetforum' or similar. If there isn't I hope there will be, so this and numerous recent articles, which have no place here, have a place to be, there is obviously a perceived need by the posters of these articles. Alf 10:09, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * We have a whole Wiki Science wikibook on how to set up and run one's own wiki, if that is what one wants to do. Uncle G 10:57:43, 2005-08-22 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll suggest that to the more competent looking posters of similar material, personally I have no interest whatsoever in them. Alf 21:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be part of the whole "TES"/"TESF" schmear (though which isn't even referenced); presumably vanity. Page has since been blanked by creator. Steve Summit (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Optichan 19:06, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.