Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable lines in the Star Wars series (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete per result of this and previous AfD (which was transwiki and delete) Just zis Guy you know? 20:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Notable lines in the Star Wars series (second nomination)

 * First AfD.
 * Delete. Per WP:NOT: "Wikipedia articles are not [...] lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as quotations." Failure to transwiki content in over a month's time despite ruling of first AfD.  &mdash; Mike (talk &bull; contribs) 16:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nom. Tevildo 16:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is pretty obviously a dumping ground for stubs on these lines, but this one is pretty much Wars trivia without a lot of encyclopedic value. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 17:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. May be a candidate for Wikiquote, probably not a candidate for here. Just zis Guy you know? 18:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Listcruft, triviacruft, fancruft. KillerChihuahua?!? 18:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the last AfD, it's already been transwikied (transwookieed? bwahahaha!), so I really see no reason for it to exist on WP- it's sure as hell not encyclopedic. -- Kicking222 18:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, material has already been transwikied. Nonencyclopedic, fails WP:NOT, as per nom. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 20:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per above. We're not Wikiquote. &mdash; Deckill e r 20:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.