Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable people of the 20th century


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Notable people of the 20th century

 * — (View AfD)

delete list cruft, it would contain everyon by definition in wikipedia in the 20th century.. Buridan 01:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 02:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Define notable? This article would be huge and would cause a huge amount of POV.  Culv e  rin  ?   Talk  06:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Since inclusion in Wikipedia automatically qualifies them for inclusion on this list it is unneeded. We have plenty of categories for people. Koweja 03:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * delete indeed, but who spent all that time creating this?!--Dmz5 03:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. And what constitutes notable anyway? MER-C 04:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, for the purposes of Wikipedia, Notability (people) will tell you. Koweja 04:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The list doesn't say that, so it's arbitary and indiscriminate. Not every entry on a list of x people has to meet WP:BIO. MER-C 05:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete pointless and a waste of space. --210 physicq  ( c ) 04:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete utterly useless. And I'm not on it, so it's inaccurate.   SkierRMH, 09:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, too long and impossible to maintain ... and even less to monitor Alf photoman 15:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, indiscriminate list. Punkmorten 16:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete to avoid possible POV issues FirefoxMan 16:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Far too subjective, indiscriminate, and pointless to ever maintain such a list.  Yamaguchi先生 03:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. It would have to include every single person considered notable per Notability (people) or be subject to endless argument as to what is considered notable enough for the list. Pointless. Caim 03:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a bit too arbitrary and broad scope for a list.-- danntm T C 04:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Would create to much argument on what to be included. -- Mikedk9109  (hit me up)  22:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Qandnotq 02:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.