Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notablity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was to keep as a redirect to Notability. --  Denelson83  08:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Notablity
I recommend this page for Speedy Delete because it is a mispelling of Notability. I already created a redirect from Notability (properly spelled) this page is not necessary Valoem   talk  14:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect - they're cheap -- Whpq 15:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect —  A redirect is done - do we really need an AfD? M  a  rtinp23  16:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I was looking for a speedy delete because this is a misspelling. A misspelling should not be a redirect. Redirects are normally for alternate names. Valoem   talk  19:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment common mispellings are a valid reason to rcreate a redirect as per WP:REDIRECT. One could debate whether this particular error in spelling is common, but I would say that the very fact somebody created an article spelled incorrectly in this way is sufficient. -- Whpq 19:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Whpq. Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  22:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This should have been nominated for RfD not AfD my apologies. It's not vandalism is if move this to RfD is it? Valoem   talk  23:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Whpq, Martinp23, and BaseballBaby. --HResearcher 03:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.