Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notcoin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Second time I've closed an AFD on this article as "Delete". Let's not see another immediate recreation. Liz Read! Talk! 00:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Notcoin
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Procedural nomination per WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 11, as the redirect target of Telegram (software), or any other target, was not found suitable. The page had been moved to draftspace on the day of its creation, as not ready for mainspace, however the creator had rejected the draftification. Jay 💬 06:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already at AFD before so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Games,  and Software.  Jay  💬 06:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  16:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Telegram: Significant coverage in BBC Pidgin and likely in the non-English articles as well (which I cannot read). Telegram article is long but could easily accommodate a short section on the game, which seems to have drawn attention. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * A merge to The Open Network (TON) would be more suitable in this case. - Anwon (talk) 20:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: In the first AFD discussion, the closure was Delete but this discussion is bringing up more possible outcomes. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete what is this? A game?  A crypto-coin?  A ponzi scheme?  The sources don't say (and are largely about a related game called "Hamster Combat"), which demonstrates that there is insufficiently substantial coverage. Walsh90210 (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I am opposed to a redirect to Telegram (software). If this content were on the Telegram article, I would remove it as WP:UNDUE and inherently somewhat promotional. Walsh90210 (talk) 23:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: The Persian article has همستر کامبت (Hamster Kombat) as the article subject: https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%87%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B1_%DA%A9%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%AA Hamster Kombat and Notcoin seem like they are separate crypto games on Telegram? From machine translation and the images, the sources cited in the English article, like this one, appear to be about Hamster Kombat or crypto games in general, not about Notcoin. For a redirect, Telegram (software) seems an appropriate target. I'll abstain from voting, though, because I can't read most of the coverage on these games. Rjjiii  (talk) 02:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist, no consensus here yet. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Open Network (TON). The Persian-language sources seem to be primarily about a hamster-related game of a different name that employs the Notcoin/"Natcoin" token. But I'm not seeing WP:SIGCOV for Notcoin itself, at least not in sources that clear WP:NCRYPTO; however, WP:TRADES sources do show evidence that it's a major game/token on TON, so as an AtD that redirect makes sense. Like Walsh90210 I would oppose a redirect to Telegram. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:27, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet more unimportant cryptotrash.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 16:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * delete. fails general notability guideline. subject of article is also unfocused. ltb d l (talk) 06:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – what an unholy mess. Plainly not remotely suitably sourced, and the article content wanders all over the place. Draftify if the user wants, but since they don't seem to want that, deletion is the right option. Possibly salt so they don't do it again. Or block them, of course. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.