Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notebook lesson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  20:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Notebook lesson

 * — (View AfD)

Appears to be insufficiently attested neologism. Delete unless there is evidence of wider usage. --Nlu (talk) 08:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn neologism, 821 ghits. MER-C 08:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Bec-Thorn-Berry 11:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC) [1]
 * Delete FirefoxMan 16:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC) [1]
 * Delete neologism for very small group, nn.  SkierRMH, 05:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. —ShadowHalo 05:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC) [1]
 * Delete Per nom this is non-noteable (I came up with 978 Google hits) and not worthy of mention on Wikipedia. In addition, the article (which is 11 words long) contributes no useful information. I also believe that WP:NOT also applies in this case.Davidpdx 10:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I was working on the article. The Underconstruction template has been replaced with the Afd. I do not believe WP:NOT applies as the german article shows and as the research articles on the topic show. --Fasten 19:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to wireless classroom : It's not a neologism but a generic compound term that refers to sth. which is and becomes more self-evident with the proliferation of laptops (e.g. the OLPC). The term "laptop classroom", which has a redirect to this term, has 42 references on Google Scholar. I've chosen notebook lesson over laptop classroom because the choice of classroom itself doesn't have any connection with the use of laptop computers by the students, so "laptop classroom" seemed somewhat of a misnomer to me. The term "wireless classroom" has 189 references on Google Scholar . See also: de:Notebook-Klasse. --Fasten 12:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC) (primary author)
 * Comment I feel it is very bad taste to add the line below reminding users about the rules as well as attempting to supress the opinions that people have expressed. If the User:Fasten truly cared about following the rules he/she would also make a note that they are the origonal authors of this article as is stated in the rules. Davidpdx 13:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the compliment ;-) --Fasten 19:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Fasten's "keep" comment makes it appear that this is not only a neologism, but completely original research. --Nlu (talk) 19:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC) [1]
 * The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasten (talk • contribs)
 * Please do not make the comment, like you previously did, look like it came from me. And putting it outside the discussion text is inappropriate.  --Nlu (talk) 19:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.