Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nothing is Strange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Nothing is Strange

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book. Self-published book with some notice in the blogosphere, but no reliable sources. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't really find any coverage in places that Wikipedia would consider reliable. Cultured Vultures initially looked like it might pass the difficult RS test on Wikipedia, however a look quickly showed that they accept sponsored posts (one of the quickest ways to make a site unreliable), their site featured no true information about their editorial process, and it also had a lot of broken html. I wish the author well, but this just doesn't pass NBOOK at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The notability guideline for books applies, but I have found no sources that suggest this work is notable. Author currently has no individual article. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 04:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.