Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nothnegal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Nothnegal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable unsigned band, only sources are band's own website and one blog. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable unsigned band that fails all standards for notablility. No significant coverage in reliable third party sources.  No major tours or reviews, no albums released by significant labels.  Fails all aspects of WP:N and WP:MUSIC so should be removed until the band becomes notable.  The   Seeker 4   Talk  14:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:MUSIC, non-notable unsigned band, almost an A7. ukexpat (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, while they do technically pass WP:MUSIC for the members Kevin Talley and Marco Sneck, I'm going to exercise the "common sense exceptions" clause just because of the lack of reliable sources out there. For a band who have gained "attention from the international media and to have high profile musicians in their lineup", all I could find was the one above, this & this trivial mention.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 21:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   — Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 22:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.