Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notinism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Notinism

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NEOLOGISM created by an artists' collective that fails WP:GNG. The refs are either dead or unhelpful, and I couldn't find anything else. I considered a redirect to Holeg Spies, but (1) this term is not mentioned in the target; and (2) I'm not convinced Spies is notable either. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete this isn't a notable -ism, it has not been covered in the art press or by anyone else for that matter. I also think the nominator's concerns about the notability of Holeg Spies are justified. Vexations (talk) 20:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The article fails to establish why this is a notable subject.TH1980 (talk) 04:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No good solid RS here for this concept. Deathlibrarian (talk) 09:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find any RS Spudlace (talk) 07:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.