Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notorious online


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 00:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Notorious online

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Still does not assert notability. Roleplayer (talk) 13:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No outside notability given. The only links are to the website itself and its MySpace page. I get no Google News hits. Fails WP:WEB Doc StrangeTelepathic MessagesStrange Frequencies 14:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable or independent sources to show notability. DarkAudit (talk) 14:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.   -- Roleplayer (talk) 14:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep We have bloggers whove listened to the station and a free radio wiki to back what is said in our article. Even though these do not count I still urge you to give us time for the local press publication to appear. We are simply a community project who wished to be recognised within this encyclpeadia --Notoriousonline (talk) 15:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete The author even admits that local press publication has yet to appear. Maxamegalon2000 16:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable, bloggers aren't reliable sources TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 18:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 23:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete A "wish to be recognized" is not a reason to keep an article about yourself but even one or two articles in reliable secondary sources would be. Absent those, notability cannot be established and the article should be deleted for now.  If in the future this situation should change the article can be re-created and properly referenced. - Dravecky (talk) 06:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.