Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notpron (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Notpron
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No indication of notability. Already been deleted at AFD once, but that was some time ago. Only 1 independent references given and that is a small piece from De Spiegel - not significant coverage in multiple independent sources. noq (talk) 12:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Looks like they decided to forego mainstream reviews entirely. Found a few reviews by smaller publications and will try to collate later to establish some form of notability. - Rushyo  Talk  14:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Found a bit more, but not sure if it meets notability requirements. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Joystiq can generally be used to establish notability, but Mobygames cannot. I'm unfamiliar either way with the other 2 sources. Sergecross73   msg me   20:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as not suitable in WP. WP:NOT. Several unsourced parts violate WP:OR. As evidenced by comments above, lacks GNG and RS.  (I searched and found 'cheats' in blogs and similar web sites but nothing beyond what was found above). DocTree (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. All references are self-references. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NWEB and WP:NOT, the only third party sources available are either gameguides/hints/etc or game sites that indicate the existence of the subject site. No refs found to establish historical significance or cultural impact. --Tgeairn (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as others have explained. - Frankie1969 (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.