Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notre Dame Broadcasting Corporation (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) clpo13(talk) 09:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Notre Dame Broadcasting Corporation
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only passing mentions found for the subject; no significant coverage. Sixth of March 10:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - multiple award winning radio station with plenty of coverage online: search on "NDBC+award". Norvoid (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The citations added to the article came from three sources; one of which is a primary source and the other one seems to be a database of Philippine legislations, so the subject may not pass GNG. Citations should came from multiple relible sources, not only from The Philippine Star, and it should be independent of the subject. Sixth of March 12:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep 6 broadcasting stations, plus details of this network can be sourced to independent news articles like .E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Other news sources cite it, MindaNews: .E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There are lots of sources, just use better keywords:, , .E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Questioning the necessity of this nomination, after I - belatedly - looked at the AFD that Kept this article unanimously less than a twelvemonth ago.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Wow was my grammar really that bad in the other AFD? ... Anywho Keep per the sources found above, Meets GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.