Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nottingham Forest Results 2005-06


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Nottingham Forest Results 2005-06
Wikipedia is not a results service. Warofdreams talk 13:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no and a merge to Nottingham Forest F.C. would not really be appropriate either. Recury 13:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete More appropriate for the official club website or a fansite than an encyclopedia.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   16:14, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with prejudice per Wikipedia, she ain't a free webhost and WP:Whiskey Tango Foxtrot WilyD 17:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Far too specific. A "seasons" page outlining the clubs fortunes from each season would be encyclopedic, but there is no need for this much detail. Dan1980 07:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. When do we get to revisit Eastern_Suburbs_1912_Season with the same sanity.  (and Forest are much, much more notable than Eastern Suburbs... -- GWO
 * Delete. The club is notable but these results are not. -- Alias Flood 23:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.