Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nottingham University Christian Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Nottingham University Christian Union
Incomplete nomination by. See this edit for xyr rationale. No opinion. Uncle G 18:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Against. No arguments for deletion provided by proposer.  No edit to talk page before my own. DFH 18:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I work full time with UCCF, the network of Christian Unions of which NUCU is one.  Indeed, I am on the same team as those who support NUCU.  The article at present does not make a claim of notability, and I don't believe it has any.  Only a few uni CU's are notable by wikipedia standards - CICCU is the only example I can think of.  To be notable, the CU must be significant enough to the subject of multiple non-trivial independent published sources.  This article presents no indication that NUCU is - and from my own knowledge of the CU, I would be gobsmacked to say that it is.  However, having said that NUCU is non-notable by wikipedia standards, I don't wish to imply at all that the work of NUCU is not notable by God's standards - quite the reverse... I fully support the important work that the NUCU do in universities.TJ 18:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- fails WP:CORP Thunderwing 19:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - it's slightly suspicious that this article was edited by an IP with only one edit; it is hard to assume good faith, and indeed my strong suspicion is that it might be found that it's a specific vandal using the birmingham uni computers, who has a fondness of vandalising any page connected to UCCF... which isn't to say the article shouldn't be deleted (I still think it should be), but I felt I should bring that to the attention to voters on this section. TJ 20:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per TJ. -Amatulic 21:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.