Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nourhaghighi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete per WP:SNOW since it's hard to find a policy it doesn't contravene in some way. Just zis Guy you know? 23:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Nourhaghighi
Speedy contested, PROD contested without reason; brought here as a formality, I would hope. Vanity and possibly copyright violating text dump from his autobiography. Subject may be notable (despite his Tripod-hosted website, gets a modest number of Google hits), but this article is useless in this form, and I doubt the user will allow its cleanup into a useful one without creating vanity edits (a la James W. Walter?). Reads more like a soapbox than a biography anyway; already exists on this user's page (and his talk page?!) as well, so no point in a userfy. On that basis, delete. Kinu t /c  05:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Delete, if not speedy. -- Andy Saunders 05:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Vanity, OR and NPOV are obvious. Two chapters of an autobiography? If there's not a speedy rule to cover this, there certainly should be. Fan1967 05:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually I think you can Speedy as R2. The fact that his user and talk page are filled with different rants doesn't change the fact that this stuff belongs there. Fan1967 06:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * R2 means the article should be deleted because it is a redirect to user space doesn't it? --kingboyk 23:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * R2 is unintelligible. I speedied it as C3PO.  Just zis Guy you know? 23:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, POV, vanity and nn. --Ter e nce Ong 16:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. --Ezeu 18:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.