Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nourhan Kandil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Nourhan Kandil

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable health coach with minor English coverage. Plus, the page has a long contribution history of sockpuppets Sillva1 (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:08, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment. Most of the references are in Arabic, but I have added translations of the titles to help editors evaluate the usefulness of individual references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * delete seems like this person is aiming to be a social media celebrity doctor; sources are mostly low-quality social media bloggy sites; would need to be completely worked over. Jytdog (talk) 02:07, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 11:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Article is of poor quality and the subject is an obscure one, but it strangely satisfies the WP:GNG criteria. It is backed by a fair amount of secondary sources like Al-Masry Al-Youm and El Watan, which are somewhat reliable. Per GNG#3, sources do not have to be available online or written in English. It is also not a our job as Wikipedians to evaluate the career motives of the subject of a BLP, and I don't see any socks in the page history. What we should be examining instead is the main contributors' motives and whether there is a COI involved, the evidence of which I have yet to see. The obscure nature of this subject is the only reason why I'm in the "weak" !keep zone. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 22:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete It may be a bit early for that personality to receive a wiki page. 196.157.255.129 (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.