Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nourishing the Planet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Worldwatch Institute. Consensus seemed to be to keep the content, but not enough for it's own article. (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 13:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nourishing the Planet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure advocacy, part of a promotional campaign with articles on the founder and on allied organizations. The notability doesn't hold up either: The NYT source given mentions neither her nor the organization, and refs to the other papers are to her own columns in them. The refs to the cities are to press releases, labelled as such.  DGG ( talk ) 20:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Danielle Nierenberg or at least mention at a related article as my searches of "Nourishing the Planet Danielle Nierenberg" found several links at Books, News, browser and Highbeam but there's unlikely separate improvement here. Pinging past taggers and .  SwisterTwister   talk  21:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Worldwatch Institute. The project doesn't seem hugely notable in its own right, but I think coverage of it in the organisation's page would be appropriate, and more so than redirecting to the article on its director. Robofish (talk) 22:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Worldwatch Institute, for same reasons as stated by nominator and Robofish. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   18:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.