Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nous Infosystems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  00:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Nous Infosystems

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not show notability, and sounds like a corporation "About" page. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Offices in five countries, 700 employees and non-trivial press coverage; I can't see the issue here. – iridescent  18:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. As per User:Iridescent. Article could be developed but even as it stands there is evident notability. - Sitush (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: The issue is not the actual notability, it's the indication of it. However, it doesn't warrant deletion.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Jasper, "Offices in five countries and 700 employees" is taken directly from the article as it was when you nominated it for deletion, and both claims are sourced. Did you even read it before you tagged it for deletion? – iridescent  19:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I did not believe that showed notability - there are many such corporations.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that you need to re-read WP:N then. - Sitush (talk) 19:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Jasper, please—before you do any more deletion tagging, at least read the first line of WP:Notability. "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list", and even a cursory glance at the references shows that this criterion is met. The fact that "there are many such corporations" is among the reasons we have articles. –  iridescent  19:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.