Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nousics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as a blatant hoax. There are absolutely zero hits on Google outside of Wikipedia mirrors. This was obviously made up by the creator and only substantial editor to the article. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Nousics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently either a hoax or an incredibly obscure neologism by an incredibly obscure "philosopher"; I'm leaning toward the former. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find any online or book sources talking about it. Therefore, it seems to fail WP:N. It's not notable, if it's even an actual field of study. Tim  meh  !  23:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; once you remove the blatant original research on bioethics, what you have left fails WP:NOTDICDEF. Considering there's no apparent sources out there, there's no way to rescue this article. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 23:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.