Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NovaDB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

NovaDB

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Cannot find any significant coverage for this software. Haakon (talk) 22:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: The project is well maintained and is about to receive VC Sumdeus (talk) 23:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC) — Sumdeus (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep: Citations are provided, topic is notable. Autumray6 (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC) — Autumray6 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Just because an article has citations doesn't necessarily mean the subject is notable. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 00:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Just because an article has citations doesn't necessarily mean the subject is notable. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 00:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: Autumray6 and Sumdeus have been accused of sockpuppetry. Haakon (talk) 23:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: See Sockpuppet investigations/Sumdeus for my comment on the matter, you Nazi - without people like you to deal with I might have contributed to more articles in the past. I deeply apologize for having a life. Sumdeus (talk) 23:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. "Citations" are all self-published. Searches show no notability whatsoever for this software. Appears to be advertising. --NellieBly (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising: combines high security, extensible scalability, data management, distributed computing, a simple web-based interface (iNetGUI) available via an embedded HTTP/HTTPS server, search capabilities, intelligent infrastructure, reporting, and custom web capabilities into a single platform. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are no non self-published reliable sources I can find.  There is no claim of notability.  The Wikipedia article was created by the author of the software, which is confirmed with his post here. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Advertising Wikipedia is failing to deal with paid advertising budgets. Get rid of this crap. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.