Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nova Libertas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 17:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Nova Libertas
Non-notable ultra-liberal organization. Most probably vanity (seems to have been created by Vincent De Roeck (proposed Afd), the president of the organization, under the name User:Berchemboy, see uploader of Image:Deroeckdegucht.JPG) Edcolins 11:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. --Edcolins 11:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep this article. The organization does exist. It is a thinktank, well-known in Leuven and this article definitely do not merit a deletion. I agree that some words (like e.g. "eminent") are to be erased, but the article in general is not better nor worse than others. --User:Berchemboy 2 july 2006
 * Delete fails to meet WP:ORG - "Nova Libertas" +site:be gets zero ghits; well-known in Leuven, well perhaps, but not at the other end of the N2. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. They're libertarian not liberal (big difference), not that that should matter. I'm suspicious when an AfD has political trigger words in it, I always wonder what ulterior motive the nominator may have. In this case though the group appears non-notable, the Google search brings up Wikipedia and mirrors plus a few blogs. Ifnord 16:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * er.. there was no ulterior motive, sorry about that. You are right, it is indeed unnecessary to qualify the organization in the nomination. I've amended this. Thanks. --Edcolins 18:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ORG, whether it exists or not. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 19:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Zos 23:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.