Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nova Ray (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Nova Ray
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable: a company with one main product, providing insufficient evidence of notability other than the existence of a company website, evidence for patents, and a link to one old comparison site. Klbrain (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

This page was nominated for deletion 5 years ago, but the nomination was never completed (step 3 missing), and there was no debate. Since then, the page has been very quiet, with no improved despite being tagged. I've tried to tidy it up, but most of the existing links have vanished and hence the material is unsupported. I've checked the company website, and there are no News articles since 2006 and the 'contact' page is broken. Klbrain (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

It's also an orphan. Klbrain (talk) 08:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Maybe delete as there's simply no move target and my searches found no good sources with only this, this and this. SwisterTwister   talk  06:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   08:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability just hasn't been established. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons stated by nominator. Also, the article on remotely operated underwater vehicles says nothing about this product, suggesting that it is not very notable even within its own narrow field.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.