Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nova Studios (Hull)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Nova Studios (Hull)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promoy, non notable company L3X1 (distant write)  16:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

5.198.60.218 (talk) 09:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)I added the Nova entry - certainly hope it complies with Wikipedia's guidelines and would not wish to use the entry simply to advertise the business. However, we certainly are a business, but I would suggest that our work on Basil's Kirchin's life and story is culturally significant and that it validates our inclusion. Furthermore, the non-commercial work we produced for Hull's City of Culture bid has historical, social and cultural significance in Hull's story.5.198.60.218 (talk) 09:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG as I am able to find passing mention of the firm in local media but unable to find substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although I wouldn't call this a spam article, I do think the IP address is overstating the significance of producing a commissioned film.  If the article is truly presenting the most substantial coverage available, then I don't see how the notability guidelines are being met.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.